Environment is powerful than willpower
β’
The foundation of this argument is that creating an optimal learning environment is more important than relying on students' willpower.
β¦
The well-known Nudge Theory supports the significance of the environment in shaping behavior.
βͺ
Nudge Theory, a concept in behavioral economics, states that small environmental changes can greatly impact people's actions(μ°Έκ³ 3).
βͺ
For example, if you want to try a diet, it would be much more effective to reduce plate size to encourage portion control instead of depending on willpower with big size of plate.
β’
Allowing students to use smartphones means that students have to rely heavily on thier own willpower. Banning mobile phones in schools ensures that students remain focused on their studies, as smartphones are a major source of distraction. Without smartphones, students are more likely to engage in classroom activities and discussions, thus improving their educational experience. It is essential to ban smartphone usage in schools to maintain environment for study.
β’
Purpose of the usage is not important
β’
The problem is not primarily focused on the purpose for which students use smartphones.
β¦
In the paper <The Relationship Between Smartphone Use and Academic Performance>, even when learners looked for useful information with their smartphones, students copied answers directly into their work without reasoning (μ°Έκ³ 2).
β¦
As a result, researchers concluded that smartphones have negative effects on students' academic performance even though they were used for school-related learning activities (μ°Έκ³ 1).
β’
Not only is it difficult for students to control their smartphone use, but even if they can, it is very easy for them to believe that using a smartphone for educational purposes is not problematic.
β’
Regardless of what students do with their smartphones, some research shows that it negatively impacts education levels. It is essential to ban smartphone usage in schools to maintain education levels.
Safety problems & Rights
β’
We must remember that the main topic of this debate is focused on education levels, not safety issues. However, it is also true that unsafe learning environments can lead to a decline in students' education levels.
β’
you m cb. By allowing unrestricted smartphone use in schools, the rights of students who may be affected by distractions or cyberbullying should also be considered. Cyberbullying, in particular, is much harder to detect.
β’
Banning mobile phones in schools can help reduce incidents of cyberbullying, which can be detrimental to a student's emotional well-being and ability to focus on their studies. A safe and supportive environment is essential for maintaining education levels.
β’
In cases where students or parents argue that smartphones are necessary for communication, alternative means of communication can be suggested, such as school-provided devices that are restricted to essential communication purposes only.
β’
We can also consider a limited ban. The ban would only apply during school hours or within the school premises, allowing students to use their smartphones outside of school.
β’
How to
β’
items of entertainment
β’
source of information
β’
not always disturb students to look for information
β’
contact to parents and family, safety issues
β’
how can they use their phone
β’
know how to behave online
β’
parse me : μΈμ κ° μ΄ κΈμ μ°μ΄λ©΄ μ’μ κ² κ°μ μ¬λ£λ€.
1.
None
from : κ³Όκ±°μ μ΄λ€ μκ°μ΄ μ΄ μκ°μ λ§λ€μλκ°?
2.
supplementary : μ΄λ€ μλ‘μ΄ μκ°μ΄ μ΄ λ¬Έμμ μμ±λ μκ°μ λ·λ°μΉ¨νλκ°?
1.
None
opposite : μ΄λ€ μλ‘μ΄ μκ°μ΄ μ΄ λ¬Έμμ μμ±λ μκ°κ³Ό λμ‘°λλκ°?
1.
None
to : μ΄ λ¬Έμμ μμ±λ μκ°μ΄ μ΄λ€ μκ°μΌλ‘ λ°μ λκ³ μ΄μ΄μ§λκ°?
1.
None
μ°Έκ³ : λ νΌλ°μ€